JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 13, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Juan Chacon Rojas Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Aproximadamente 1415 personas le solicitaron a la Corte impartir algunas órdenes para el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-648/13 y exigir a una serie de entidades el inicio de investigaciones dirigidas a sancionar el incumplimiento de la misma.

La Sala de Revisión evidencia que el presente caso no encuadra en ninguna de las hipótesis que permiten a la Corporación hacer uso de su competencia excepcional y promover el cumplimiento de uno de sus fallos de manera directa, ni dar trámite al correspondiente incidente de desacato.

Precisa igualmente, que no le corresponde proceder en la forma en que lo solicitaron los accionantes.

Se DENIEGA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR las solicitudes -referidas en el numeral 5 de los antecedentes de esta providencia- presentadas el 27 de junio de 2017, el 26 de julio de 2017 y el 3 de noviembre de 2017 por aproximadamente 1415 ciudadanos.
  2. Segundo. La presente decision se entendera notificada a todos los solicitantes a partir del momento en el que se publique en la pagina web de la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.